💭 Motion Statistics

In the aftermath of a nuclear apocalypse, This House would establish a new society based on the principles of the "Noble Lie." (Philosophy) GF

View Info Slide
No teams debated this motion
No teams vetoed this motion

TH, as the environmental movement, would prioritise supporting green energy (e.g., solar, wind) companies over criticising fossil fuel companies (e.g., Shell, Saudi Aramco). (Environment) R3

18%
41%
3 Gov wins 7 Opp wins
imbalanced at 50% level
9%
6%
3 Gov vetoes 2 Opp vetoes
balance inconclusive

THBT governments should design economic policy assuming citizens are financially irrational (ie. default enrollment in pension and saving schemes, opt-out rather than opt-in welfare programs,etc). (Economics) R4

12%
24%
2 Gov wins 4 Opp wins
balance inconclusive
15%
12%
5 Gov vetoes 4 Opp vetoes
balance inconclusive

This house believes that choice feminism has done more harm than good for the feminist movement. (Social Movements) R5

View Info Slide
6%
18%
1 Gov win 3 Opp wins
balance inconclusive
15%
29%
5 Gov vetoes 10 Opp vetoes
imbalanced at 50% level

This house believes that eco terrorism has done more harm than good for the environmental movement. (Environment) R3

View Info Slide
29%
6%
5 Gov wins 1 Opp win
balance inconclusive
12%
21%
4 Gov vetoes 7 Opp vetoes
imbalanced at 50% level

This house believes that history education should prioritize the experiences of everyday people over the actions of great leaders. (Education) R1

View Info Slide
18%
6%
3 Gov wins 1 Opp win
balance inconclusive
12%
18%
4 Gov vetoes 6 Opp vetoes
probably balanced

This House believes that new democracies should embrace the politics of forgetting rather than the politics of confronting. (Politics) QF

View Info Slide
25%
1 Gov win 0 Opp wins
balance inconclusive
25%
13%
2 Gov vetoes 1 Opp veto
balance inconclusive

This House Believes That social movements should exclude allies who do not share the lived experience of the affected community. (Social Movements) R5

24%
0 Gov wins 4 Opp wins
balance inconclusive
26%
6%
9 Gov vetoes 2 Opp vetoes
imbalanced at 5% level

This house believes that states should prioritise bilateral trade deals over large-scale multilateral deals. (International Relations) SF

View Info Slide
50%
0 Gov wins 1 Opp win
balance inconclusive
25%
1 Gov veto 0 Opp vetoes
balance inconclusive

This House Believes that that bilateral agreements are more effective than regional economic alliances for economic development. (International Relations) SF

50%
0 Gov wins 1 Opp win
balance inconclusive
25%
1 Gov veto 0 Opp vetoes
balance inconclusive

This house opposes the "move fast, break things" philosophy in the tech sector. (Science & Tech) R2

View Info Slide
12%
12%
2 Gov wins 2 Opp wins
balance inconclusive
32%
0 Gov vetoes 11 Opp vetoes
imbalanced at 0.1% level

This house opposes the rise in transmedia. (Science & Tech) R2

View Info Slide
12%
29%
2 Gov wins 5 Opp wins
balance inconclusive
26%
9%
9 Gov vetoes 3 Opp vetoes
imbalanced at 10% level

This house prefers a world with a strong SAARC. (International Relations) SF

View Info Slide
No teams debated this motion
50%
0 Gov vetoes 2 Opp vetoes
balance inconclusive

This house prefers the half-empty over half-full philosophy in life. (Philosophy) GF

View Info Slide
No teams debated this motion
No teams vetoed this motion

This house regrets the rise of identity politics in the 21st century. (Politics) QF

View Info Slide
No teams debated this motion
13%
38%
1 Gov veto 3 Opp vetoes
balance inconclusive

This house supports green antitrust policies. (Environment) R3

View Info Slide
6%
1 Gov win 0 Opp wins
balance inconclusive
29%
24%
10 Gov vetoes 8 Opp vetoes
probably balanced

This House Supports social movements' use of disruptive methods of protest. (Social Movements) R5

View Info Slide
24%
29%
4 Gov wins 5 Opp wins
balance inconclusive
9%
15%
3 Gov vetoes 5 Opp vetoes
balance inconclusive

This house supports the Ciceronian Philosophy of love. (Philosophy) GF

View Info Slide
100%
1 Gov win 0 Opp wins
balance inconclusive
No teams vetoed this motion

This house supports the global shift towards homeland economics. (Economics) R4

View Info Slide
12%
12%
2 Gov wins 2 Opp wins
balance inconclusive
29%
12%
10 Gov vetoes 4 Opp vetoes
imbalanced at 50% level

This house supports the significant involvement of high profile individuals in politics (celebrities, billionaires, notable authors, Nobel prize winners). (Politics) QF

View Info Slide
25%
50%
1 Gov win 2 Opp wins
balance inconclusive
13%
1 Gov veto 0 Opp vetoes
balance inconclusive

This House Supports Zero Percent Mandatory Attendance Policies in Higher Education. (Education) R1

View Info Slide
41%
18%
7 Gov wins 3 Opp wins
imbalanced at 50% level
9%
12%
3 Gov vetoes 4 Opp vetoes
balance inconclusive

This House Would introduce outcome-based contracts for professors in publicly funded universities. (Education) R1

View Info Slide
6%
12%
1 Gov win 2 Opp wins
balance inconclusive
24%
15%
8 Gov vetoes 5 Opp vetoes
imbalanced at 50% level

This House Would nationalize the internet. (Science & Tech) R2

View Info Slide
12%
24%
2 Gov wins 4 Opp wins
balance inconclusive
24%
9%
8 Gov vetoes 3 Opp vetoes
imbalanced at 50% level

THP slower but inclusive growth over rapid but uneven growth. (Economics) R4

View Info Slide
18%
24%
3 Gov wins 4 Opp wins
balance inconclusive
6%
26%
2 Gov vetoes 9 Opp vetoes
imbalanced at 5% level