💭 Motion Statistics
Round 1

This house believes that history education should prioritize the experiences of everyday people over the actions of great leaders. (Education)

View Info Slide
18%
6%
3 Gov wins 1 Opp win
balance inconclusive
12%
18%
4 Gov vetoes 6 Opp vetoes
probably balanced

This House Supports Zero Percent Mandatory Attendance Policies in Higher Education. (Education)

View Info Slide
41%
18%
7 Gov wins 3 Opp wins
imbalanced at 50% level
9%
12%
3 Gov vetoes 4 Opp vetoes
balance inconclusive

This House Would introduce outcome-based contracts for professors in publicly funded universities. (Education)

View Info Slide
6%
12%
1 Gov win 2 Opp wins
balance inconclusive
24%
15%
8 Gov vetoes 5 Opp vetoes
imbalanced at 50% level
Round 2

This House Would nationalize the internet. (Science & Tech)

View Info Slide
12%
24%
2 Gov wins 4 Opp wins
balance inconclusive
24%
9%
8 Gov vetoes 3 Opp vetoes
imbalanced at 50% level

This house opposes the "move fast, break things" philosophy in the tech sector. (Science & Tech)

View Info Slide
12%
12%
2 Gov wins 2 Opp wins
balance inconclusive
32%
0 Gov vetoes 11 Opp vetoes
imbalanced at 0.1% level

This house opposes the rise in transmedia. (Science & Tech)

View Info Slide
12%
29%
2 Gov wins 5 Opp wins
balance inconclusive
26%
9%
9 Gov vetoes 3 Opp vetoes
imbalanced at 10% level
Round 3

TH, as the environmental movement, would prioritise supporting green energy (e.g., solar, wind) companies over criticising fossil fuel companies (e.g., Shell, Saudi Aramco). (Environment)

18%
41%
3 Gov wins 7 Opp wins
imbalanced at 50% level
9%
6%
3 Gov vetoes 2 Opp vetoes
balance inconclusive

This house believes that eco terrorism has done more harm than good for the environmental movement. (Environment)

View Info Slide
29%
6%
5 Gov wins 1 Opp win
balance inconclusive
12%
21%
4 Gov vetoes 7 Opp vetoes
imbalanced at 50% level

This house supports green antitrust policies. (Environment)

View Info Slide
6%
1 Gov win 0 Opp wins
balance inconclusive
29%
24%
10 Gov vetoes 8 Opp vetoes
probably balanced
Round 4

THBT governments should design economic policy assuming citizens are financially irrational (ie. default enrollment in pension and saving schemes, opt-out rather than opt-in welfare programs,etc). (Economics)

12%
24%
2 Gov wins 4 Opp wins
balance inconclusive
15%
12%
5 Gov vetoes 4 Opp vetoes
balance inconclusive

THP slower but inclusive growth over rapid but uneven growth. (Economics)

View Info Slide
18%
24%
3 Gov wins 4 Opp wins
balance inconclusive
6%
26%
2 Gov vetoes 9 Opp vetoes
imbalanced at 5% level

This house supports the global shift towards homeland economics. (Economics)

View Info Slide
12%
12%
2 Gov wins 2 Opp wins
balance inconclusive
29%
12%
10 Gov vetoes 4 Opp vetoes
imbalanced at 50% level
Round 5

This House Supports social movements' use of disruptive methods of protest. (Social Movements)

View Info Slide
24%
29%
4 Gov wins 5 Opp wins
balance inconclusive
9%
15%
3 Gov vetoes 5 Opp vetoes
balance inconclusive

This House Believes That social movements should exclude allies who do not share the lived experience of the affected community. (Social Movements)

24%
0 Gov wins 4 Opp wins
balance inconclusive
26%
6%
9 Gov vetoes 2 Opp vetoes
imbalanced at 5% level

This house believes that choice feminism has done more harm than good for the feminist movement. (Social Movements)

View Info Slide
6%
18%
1 Gov win 3 Opp wins
balance inconclusive
15%
29%
5 Gov vetoes 10 Opp vetoes
imbalanced at 50% level
Quarterfinals

This house supports the significant involvement of high profile individuals in politics (celebrities, billionaires, notable authors, Nobel prize winners). (Politics)

View Info Slide
25%
50%
1 Gov win 2 Opp wins
balance inconclusive
13%
1 Gov veto 0 Opp vetoes
balance inconclusive

This House believes that new democracies should embrace the politics of forgetting rather than the politics of confronting. (Politics)

View Info Slide
25%
1 Gov win 0 Opp wins
balance inconclusive
25%
13%
2 Gov vetoes 1 Opp veto
balance inconclusive
Semifinals

This house believes that states should prioritise bilateral trade deals over large-scale multilateral deals. (International Relations)

View Info Slide
50%
0 Gov wins 1 Opp win
balance inconclusive
25%
1 Gov veto 0 Opp vetoes
balance inconclusive

This House Believes that that bilateral agreements are more effective than regional economic alliances for economic development. (International Relations)

50%
0 Gov wins 1 Opp win
balance inconclusive
25%
1 Gov veto 0 Opp vetoes
balance inconclusive
Grand Final

This house supports the Ciceronian Philosophy of love. (Philosophy)

View Info Slide
100%
1 Gov win 0 Opp wins
balance inconclusive
No teams vetoed this motion